le_bebna_kamni: (Goth)
le_bebna_kamni ([personal profile] le_bebna_kamni) wrote2007-08-17 10:49 am

Back in the Groove?

Parents coming to visit can be so disruptive. And tiring. I think it's taken me a week to recover, and I'm still feeling the after-compulsion to make sure everything is obsessively-compulsively neat. I find myself bending over to pick up a speck of lint that has fallen onto the carpet.

Unfortunately, my reading has fallen dangerously behind, and the summer is waning very quickly. My calendar says that this is the the 33rd week of the year, so I foresee that I will not be making the 50 book goal...but one can always hang on and hope and pray for the winter holidays to make a last-minute comeback.

Book #24: Storm Front, by Jim Butcher

**Due to carelessness and thoughtless writing on my part, I have rewritten the review of this book. I don't recommend seeking out the original review, but the text has been moved to one of the comments for people who want to reference it.

I recently started watching the television series "The Dresden Files", and when I found out it was based on a series of novels, I thought I would check them out. For those not familiar with the show, it's about a real-life wizard who lives in the mundane world and solves magically-based crimes.

Storm Front is the first in the series of Dresden Files. Harry Dresden is drawn into investigating a series of black-magic murders, and ends up being accused of them himself. Harry has to race to find the real killer and clear his name before the wizarding law force executes him for using forbidden black magic.

For those of you who only want a recap of the TV show, there are similarities, but not enough to warrant reading the books. The Dresden Files are much better suited to real fantasy lovers, and not just prime-time watchers who wouldn't normally peruse the sci-fi/fantasy section of the bookstore. If you enjoy reading Anita Blake novels, Jim Butcher has much the same tone and quality of writing. He has a lot of violence, some racy sex (although not as graphic as Laurell K. Hamilton), and tons of magic and supernaturalism. I will definitely give kudos to Butcher, though: he seems to know his magical lore better than the Anita Blake series, at least the flavor I'm familiar with. I'm a bit curious whether his knowledge came from a background in any spiritual/religious practices, or whether he's just a good researcher.

Occasionally you run across a book that digs up unexpected memories and gets you reminiscing, and Storm Front was one of those books. For most of high school I dated a very interesting guy who introduced me to the wonders of geekdom. I had always been a sci-fi/fantasy reader, but he introduced me to things like computer games, Jolt cola (a kind of Holy Grail, because we had to drive 2-5 hours to buy any), anime, and of course role-playing games.

My boyfriend was a great storyteller, and I ate up his campaigns like candy. He had unique ideas and knew how to draw people in so that you were waiting on the edge of your seat for the next thing to happen. And it didn't help that I liked looking at him while he talked. While I've been told my tastes in men run geekier than most, his long, dark hair was gorgeous to me in a hick town full of crew cuts. He was leanly athletic and amazingly graceful from several years of martial arts training -- he could pull moves on a dance floor that would confound your average geek.

Most non-geeks don't realize how many geeks take up some form of hand-to-hand or melee weapon skill, but from my own acquaintances I'm convinced it's pretty common. When we geeks put together our character sheets and start playing epic heroes that kick ass, are adored by women (or men) and/or admired by the average joe, sooner or later we want to *be* those heroes in real life. Either that, or stop being beaten up on the playground. ;P I know that my boyfriend and many of his friends felt that way (at least about the former idea), and he certainly convinced me it was *cool* to do it. Even today -- especially with swords -- if someone says they've fought or studied a combat skill, a certain amount of geekly respect wells within me.

About six months after we started dating, my boyfriend expressed a desire to be a professional writer. He started showing me his work, in part because I was his girlfriend and he wanted to impress me, but also because I was an English tutor and got good marks on my school-required stories and compositions. And it made sense that he would be a writer: after all, he was a great GM with fantastic storytelling abilities, and many fantasy writers say they get story ideas from their campaigns. Soon my boyfriend's friends were coming to me to check over their stories, and consequently I got a lot of exposure to teenage geek fantasy writing.

One thing I learned very quickly was this: the two skills of writing and GMing are very different, even if they seem like they should be similar. What sounds stunning when proclaimed boldly in a manly warrior voice becomes cheesy and lame when lying inert in Times New Roman font. Campaigns rarely scratch below the surface of the characters who play, and even then gamers have to think on their feet to act out a person who isn't necessarily themselves. What you often end up with is a mish-mash of stereotype and the player's real personality -- a bad combination if the gamer is playing a personality vastly dissimilar to their own. Gaming characters are rarely as rich, complex, or realistic as well-thought-out fictional characters, which is why character development is probably the weakest point in a teenage geek writer's repertoire (action sequences follow a close second).

Like the teenage epic game, everyone in the world is beautiful and/or muscular -- except for the people you're obviously supposed to despise, in which case they're overweight, underweight, unsightly, or in some way visibly repulsive. The main character of teenage fantasy is almost always the author in idealistic form, which generally ends up being a bit cheesy and unrealistic.

My boyfriend had a penchant for dark, brooding characters -- characters who were both kick-ass (physically adept) and bad-ass (cold, hardened, don't-touch-me types), but who had a hidden soft spot that said he was really a good guy underneath it all. His characters were always chivalrous types, even if it seemed old-fashioned, and there was often a certain old-West feel to them in spite of the fantasy. The problem is, he could get the "good guy underneath it all" part right, but he was never very good with the bad-ass part -- largely because my boyfriend himself was a really nice guy who probably didn't have a true unfeeling, bad-ass bone in his body. From my writing classes I can tell you this axiom: even though the authors aren't necessarily their characters, you can't write what you don't know, or at least not well.

So when I read Storm Front and met Harry Dresden, suddenly I felt like I was reading my old boyfriend's work. All the characters, even some of the dialogue and action scenes sounded like they might have escaped from his pen and onto the pages I was reading. A read of the "about the author" section of the book, and a visit to the author's website and blog confirmed two things for me:
1) the auther was not my ex.
2) the author sounded a lot like my ex in so many ways it was funny, from his interests to a few of the comments he made on this blog.
The author even looked a lot like my ex-boyfriend, down to the quirky smile and raised eyebrow on his "About Jim" page.

Of course, Jim Butcher is a lot better writer than my ex (and other teen geek writers rarely match his writing ability), but I think Butcher's work still falls prey to several of the stereotypes of gamer-geek writing listed above. The women in his books are very attractive: the female detective that Harry works with, Murphy, is beautiful and athletic, as are the reporter named Susan and obviously the vampiress Bianca. In contrast, Detective Carmichael, Murphy's annoying partner who you're obviously supposed to dislike, is of course overweight, rumpled, and spills food on his clothes.

As for Harry Dresden, he sounds a lot like a fulfillment of a gamer-geek's dreams. He was once a youngster beaten up on the school playgrounds; now he's a powerful wizard who can also use guns and fight hand-to-hand. He's dark, a loner, and can scare people off in stare-down, but he also has a hidden, kind nature that doesn't fit with his hardened exterior. Some writers can pull that contrast off well, but for Dresden it just loses credibility (I have my suspicions that it's for the same reason that my boyfriend couldn't pull it off: Jim Butcher is a really nice guy). And even though Dresden supposedly isn't good with women, beautiful women always seem to show up at his doorstep. Sounds like teenage geek masturbatory material to me. ;P

Like my ex, Butcher has a way with story-telling: the plot is good -- reasonably page-turning. But somehow I just can't get connected with his from-the-gamesheet characters, and characterization is everything for me. I'm actually more pleased with the television show's choice of characterization of Harry Dresden, which is very "average joe" who happens to have powers. Now I just have to decide if Butcher's good plots are worth checking out a second book from the library.

And now for a book I'm not going to review, because I couldn't finish reading it (but I'll let someone else review it for me):

The Afterlife Experiments: Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After Death

Let me just say that if you're of any scientific inclination, this book will make you scream. The man who carried out this investigation is an accredited scientist, not your average lay-person, so I have much higher standards for the reading. All I can say is his experiments are improperly controlled, the data is subjectively scored, and the assumptions he makes are atrocious. Even if life after death exists, he's doing the wrong experiments to find evidence for it.

Grrrrrr.......

Re: Hey Thank You!

[identity profile] le-bebna-kamni.livejournal.com 2007-08-19 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
As a general rule, I don't e-mail authors unless I've seen something factually wrong or morally upsetting. Your book has neither of these things -- on the contrary, from the little I know you seem to have a fantastic grasp on the magickal world (as I said in my review), and I didn't find anything offensive. As I said before, your plots are good. If you'd like me to contact you by email outside of this post I can do so, but I'd like to at least post this apology publicly.

Since you're posting on my journal, I would love to re-pose the question I semi-asked in my review: do you have any personal religious/spiritual beliefs that might have given you a background in magick, or is it simply good research?

I'm not used to famous authors searching the internet for no-name reviews like mine tucked away on an obscure journal, so I didn't think it was important enough that you should even care what I had to say. I should have been clued in by your December 26 post that you take your fans (and not just professional critics) very seriously and personally, and I'll remember what you've said to me when reviewing other books.

Once again, I would sincerely like to apologize for hurting you, and I hope that you'll accept my apology.

Sincerely,
Jennifer

Re: Hey Thank You!

[identity profile] le-bebna-kamni.livejournal.com 2007-08-20 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, that was three parts. lol. Darn comment length limitations.