The Truth Revealed: Antibiotics are Pseudo-Science!

[le_bebna_kamni]

An amusing article, explaining the reasons why antibiotics and germ theory are a falsification by the scientific medical community, using arguments similar to those used by creationists:

"ANTIBIOTIC EFFECTIVENESS: A CRITICAL REVIEW"

[Warning: This is a Poe's Law, so don't take it too seriously. ;P]

However, this one is not a Poe, from FSTDT:

Gravity: Doesn't exist. If items of mass had any impact of others, then mountains should have people orbiting them. Or the space shuttle in space should have the astronauts orbiting it. Of course, that's just the tip of the gravity myth. Think about it. Scientists want us to believe that the sun has a gravitation pull strong enough to keep a planet like neptune or pluto in orbit, but then it's not strong enough to keep the moon in orbit? Why is that? What I believe is going on here is this: These objects in space have yet to receive mans touch, and thus have no sin to weigh them down. This isn't the case for earth, where we see the impact of transfered sin to material objects. The more sin, the heavier something is.

Comments

[sinmantyx.livejournal.com]

I had a student mention in a paper that the force of gravity was less the farther you were from the earth (not untrue) which is part of Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation. That's not bad. However, she went on to say that Newton thought of this while looking at the Moon and noticing that it didn't fall into the Earth - implying that gravity doesn't work in space. She explained that Newton saw that the apple was affected by gravity, but the moon was not, and this gave rise to the inverse square law.

It was horrifying. More horrifying is that she probably found that crap off some sort of educational sight.

[orogeny2000.livejournal.com]

*sigh* Firstly, and most obvious, I gotta say, the person who wrote the article you linked to does precisely what they so vehemently accuse the scientific community of doing. They present some data and not other to make their case seem valid. All I can say is OY. OY! so much wrong, or misinterpreted or or or... And the gravity. Again, utter misconception about the current understandings and theories. For that matter, neither of those articles show an understanding about why scientists say 'theory' instead of 'law' hmmm, and as to the 'sin weighing things down.... uh-oh. Whoever believes that should be against any mars mission, I mean..then it'll have SIN weighing it down and-OH NO, surely it will crash into earth and. Sorry for the extremely random reply, I don't know whether to laugh or cry, or where to even start.

[orogeny2000.livejournal.com]

YA, and I's silly, to read what a poe's law is AFTER my lil diatribe. what Can I say, I know too many actual creationalists who I fear would read something like that and just soak it in...